Talk:Dog Care

From MeritBadgeDotOrg

Revision as of 09:45, May 3, 2008 (edit) Scouterdennis (Talk | contribs) (New page: {{Merit Badge Talk page header}}) ← Previous diff		Current revision (18:37, May 4, 2010) (edit) (undo) RWSmith (Talk | contribs) m (→Rollback of link added by User Sally: new section)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Merit Badge Talk page header}}		{{Merit Badge Talk page header}}
		+
		+	== Rollback of link added by User Sally ==
		+
		+	While I really liked the idea of providing an external link for pet insurance information, the link provided by [[User:Sally|Sally]] went to a commercial web site that, not only has no existing "Terms of Service" or "Privacy Policy", which is wholly unacceptable, it also offers no real "free" information a Scout could use. Maybe there's another, better, safer web site out there that could provide some "free" pet insurance information; such a link would be acceptable. —'''''[[User:RWSmith|RWSmith]]''''' ''[[MeritBadgeDotOrg:Bureaucrat|(Bureaucrat)]]'', 19:37, May 4, 2010 (EDT)

---

Current revision

This is the Discussion page for discussing improvements to the associated article. Please place messages concerning errors or requested changes to the protected portions of the article on this Discussion page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. Articles have been created following a common format for all Merit Badges. Please help keep these articles in this format and help us add links to related requirements for other awards and external requirement resources. Answers, answer keys, cheat sheets, or links to them will be removed. When posting on this or any Discussion page:    Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).

Rollback of link added by User Sally

While I really liked the idea of providing an external link for pet insurance information, the link provided by Sally went to a commercial web site that, not only has no existing "Terms of Service" or "Privacy Policy", which is wholly unacceptable, it also offers no real "free" information a Scout could use. Maybe there's another, better, safer web site out there that could provide some "free" pet insurance information; such a link would be acceptable. —RWSmith (Bureaucrat), 19:37, May 4, 2010 (EDT)